中科院量子信息與量子科技創新研究院一期建筑，合肥，中國

中科院量子信息與量子科技創新研究院項目是國家發展量子科技的重要戰略部署，是安徽省科技創新“一號工程”，也是合肥綜合性國家科學中心的核心工程之一。

項目基地位于合肥高新區王咀湖公園南側科學園內，規劃為科研辦公區和生活配套區，與中科大先進技術研究院、中科大新校區形成產、學、研的配套體系。規劃設計從“量子糾纏效應”以及古代哲人的宇宙觀和哲學思想中得到啟發，以“自然之諧、科學之力、形態之序、活動之宜、均衡之美”為設計理念，希望建立一座滿足科研體量的有機生態公園：科研辦公區以相互波動交錯的形體東西向水平延展，面向城市；利用建筑形體錯動關系形成南北兩個景觀廣場；生活配套區沿西側高壓廊道集中布置，盡可能將景觀綠地納入場地?！?/p>

項目信息/Credits and Data

設計團隊/Design Team: 王建國，王志剛，侯彥普，崔慧岳，石俊垚，穆勇等/WANG Jianguo, WANG Zhigang,HOU Yanpu, CUI Huiyue, SHI Junyao, MU Yong, et al.

建筑面積/Floor Area: 252,595 m2

設計時間/Design Time: 2017

竣工時間/Completion Time: 2021

攝影/Photos: 侯博文/HOU Bowen

1 鳥瞰/Aerial view

2 臨街外景/Exterior view from the street

The project of Quantum Information and Quantum Technology Innovation Institute of the Chinese Academy of Sciences is an important strategic deployment for the development of national quantum technology. It is not only the No.1 project of technology innovation in Anhui Province, but also one of the core projects of Hefei Comprehensive National Science Centre.

Located in the science zone in the south part of Wangzuihu Park in Hefei High-tech Zone, the project is planned to include both scientific research office and living area, forming a relationship of industry-studyresearch with the Institute of Advanced Technology of University of Science and Technology of China(USTC) and the new campus of USCT. Inspired by the"quantum entanglement effect" as well as the cosmology and philosophical thoughts of ancient philosophers,the design team want to build an organic ecological park meeting the need of scientific research space, with the design concepts of "harmony of nature, power of science, sequence of form, suitability of activities and beauty of balance". The volumes of scientific research office area extend horizontally in east-west direction with fluctuating forms, facing the city. Two landscape squares are formed by the intersected volumes. The living area is arranged along the high-pressure corridor green-belt on the west side to bring the landscape into the site as much as possible.□

3 總平面/Site plan

4 首層平面/Ground floor plan

5 四層平面/Third floor plan

6 濱水外景/Waterfront view

7 東立面/East fa?ade

8 內院視景/View of the inner courtyard

9 剖面/Sections

10.11 內院視景/View of the inner courtyard

12 辦公中庭/Office atrium

13 建筑跨越泄洪溝/Building across the flood relief trench

評論

張應鵬：科研樓，尤其是實驗室類的科研樓，固有的形象大多比較嚴謹，明確而肯定的形體直接反映明確而清晰的功能，有時甚至會因此顯得有些刻板。

但這個建筑明顯比較“糾纏”?？臻g上，形體在彼此間糾纏，以至于我們很難立即分清這是一棟建筑還是兩棟建筑。形式上，“墻”與“頂”彼此糾纏，扭曲的延伸模糊了“墻”與“頂”間的傳統界線。功能上，工作與休閑也在彼此間糾纏，強調工作的同時更關心生活。

顯然，糾纏是作為設計手法介入的。這是一棟你中有我、我中有你的建筑。模糊是作為空間形式表達出來的。模糊了立面與頂面的界線后，建筑以形體的異樣性呈現出了空間的獨特性。強調工作的同時更關心生活，不只是簡單地打破了工作與生活的界線，而是對空間品質與工作品質的雙重提升，從而讓科技充滿溫情。

經院哲學曾經努力想通過不斷認知世界并最終還原一個簡單而穩定的本體世界。而事實上，復雜與不確定性才是這個世界最真實的存在，這也是傳統科技與量子科技之間在認知方式上最大的不同。

有一點浪漫，有一些模糊，同時還存在著某種明確的不確定性?！凹m纏”也許是這個建筑對量子科技最好的空間注解。

Comments

ZHANG Yingpeng: Research buildings, especially laboratory research buildings,usually have a rigorous image. A clear and affirmative shape directly reflects simple and clear functions, sometimes even becomes a little too rigid because of it.

But this building is obviously quite "entangled". Spatially, the forms are entangled with each other, so that it is difficult for us to immediately distinguish whether this is one building or two. Formally, "wall" and "top" are entangled with each other, and the twisted extension blurs the traditional boundary between them. Functionally, work and leisure are also entangled with each other, having more concern about life while emphasising work.

Obviously, entanglement is involved as a method of design. It is neither a single building nor two separated ones, but an integrated artifact. "Ambiguity"is expressed as a form of space. After blurring the boundary between the fa?ade and the top, the building presents the uniqueness of the space with its shape,and emphasises paying attention to life while working by not only simply breaking the boundary between work and life, but also improving the quality of space and work, thus making technology full of warmth.

Scholastic philosophy has tried to constantly recognise the world and finally restore a simple and stable ontological world. In fact, complexity and uncertainty are the most real existence in this world! This is also the biggest difference in cognition between traditional technology and quantum technology.

There is a bit of romance, with ambiguity, and also a certain degree of uncertainty. "Entanglement" may be the best spatial interpretation of quantum technology in this building.